Monday, November 9, 2009

New GI Bill Website

By Rohan Gupta


Congress approved the Post-9/11 GI Bill in 2009 in order to allocate additional benefits to the original GI Bill or Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944. The original bill provided college education for returning WWII veterans and a year of unemployment compensation. The newly amended bill provides additional benefits for servicemen who served in the military since September 11, 2009. These new benefits include full coverage of tuition, allowances, and other adjustment benefits.
The Council on Education recently created a website to help military veterans choose colleges and obtain education benefits designated by the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The council opened the website today and hopes to encourage many veterans to take advantage of the opportunities their website offers. Apparently, many veterans neither know how to obtain the benefits designated by the bill nor know how to use them for a college education. The website provides information concerning benefits and eligibility, college and career advice, and anecdotes about veterans who completed a college education.
Unfortunately, the website does not provide any information on an issue that I discussed in one of my older posts. The issue is concerned with the allocation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill's funds to veterans. So many veterans applied for the bill's benefits that the Department of Veterans Affairs faces a backlog that may take several months to clear. The veterans who did not receive the bill's benefits appealed to the Department of Veterans Affairs and thus created another problem for the department. Hopefully, the department can fix these issues soon and provide the necessary financial aid to the veterans.
Apart from what the website may not cover, it is still a very helpful source for veterans looking to pursue higher education. Information that was not properly conveyed to these veterans earlier is now explicitly available on the council's website.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

No Coffee for You!: Ridding the Campus of Its Coffee Stands

By Shane Le Master

Many people say that the innumerable coffee shops and coffee stands scattered around Georgia Tech’s campus are a very nice touch and that their presence makes getting coffee very convenient. However, many young adults are using coffee now as a means of neglecting sleep. Instead of being responsible and practicing good time management to get to bed a decent hour, many students are pulling “all-nighters” and then drinking coffee to keep themselves awake. Students, as being growing young adults and as individuals who extensively use their minds, need to be sure that they are getting adequate sleep every night. In order to better facilitate these healthy habits, Georgia Tech needs to remove all the coffee enterprises on campus. This way, more students will find it more inconvenient to supplement little sleep with caffeine. Instead, they will develop more prudent and sustainable sleep patterns.

College statistics show a strong correlation between coffee consumption and poor sleep among students. According to a study by Texas A&M University, 93% of students do not get enough sleep. A report in the Villanova University newspaper shows that on average, 90% of young people consume coffee on a regular basis. It is doubtless that there is a strong relation between students who do not sleep adequately and students who regularly consume coffee. The school needs to identify this correlation and make the necessary changes in order to promote the well-being of its students. A removal of all the coffee shops and coffee stands on campus would make students less likely to use caffeine as a fall back when they imprudently fail to make time for adequate sleep. The final result would be a more responsible, more rested, and more productive student body. On Facebook, hopefully we will be able to see an end to the “I love coffee” and the “Pulling an all-nighter again” status updates and instead be able to see more things like “I love sleep” and “Looks like I’m going to get my 8 hours again.” While such an occurrence seems impossible now, it can surely happen if the school takes the necessary steps to tone down the presence of coffee on campus..

Saturday, November 7, 2009

File Sharing

by Amber Lee

During orientation we are bombarded with much advice and many warnings about how to succeed in college and stay out of trouble. One caveat that I’m sure all colleges have given regards file sharing.

All college students have at least heard about illegal file sharing and participate in it at some point while they are in college. However, new research is showing that many students may be doing so unknowingly. For example, the entire campus at Georgia Tech is wireless. When I first connected to the network I soon found that many students’ music libraries showed up when I started iTunes. There is a way to make your computer undiscoverable even though you are a part of a network, which I promptly did, but not everyone may know how to do this.

It is also somewhat unclear as to what is and is not okay to share online. For example, one student was threatened with expulsion for posting the answers to past assignments online. This caused his greatly professor to be complain and attempt to get the student expelled. Although ultimately the student’s actions weren’t against the rules and no action was taken against him, the professor’s anger is understandable. Many professors recycle their assignments if a student posts the answers online they run the risk of future students finding the answers and cheating.

But the most notorious form of file sharing is the illegal sharing of songs. The music industry has been combating the piracy of songs for about ten years now and one of their biggest targets has been college students. But it is impossible for the RIAA to track down a specific student on a college’s network they have been using the help of the colleges themselves to prevent file sharing and issue subpoenas if necessary. Suing various individuals has done little to slow down the pirating, which is why it is finally being acknowledged that another approach has to be taken.
Most agree that the best solution seems to be having a blanket licensing fee. Meaning paying one flat fee for “unlimited” downloads. They are running a trial program at a few colleges with some success. The only problem I have is that the company offering the music may not have the songs that I want. Even now I sometimes have to shop around for the music of an artist who isn’t in the mainstream.

Ultimately, I think multiple actions have to be taken. Young people feel they are invincible, but their actions are rarely done anonymously. They need to be educated as to what exactly is wrong and illegal to do. And finally, the music industry needs to be proactive in developing an easier way to download music that is also legal.


Thursday, November 5, 2009

Laptops in Lectures

Kevin Corley

Given the large lecture classes utilized to teach mass amounts of students, it is easy for students to go unnoticed and become distracted. Most lecture classes allow the use of laptops during class as they can be useful for note taking and viewing supplementary material. However, a study mentioned in The Chronicle found that students taking laptops to class admitted that note-taking wasn’t the highest priority. Eight-one percent admitted to checking their email during class and sixty eight percent admitted to keeping instant message applications open. The truth is that while laptops can be a useful note taking tool in class, in reality they are more of a distraction than anything. Laptops are harmful to student’s grades because they are too distracting.

A professor, Cynthia M. Frisby, found that by no longer allowing the use of laptops in her class, the grades of her students increased. Personally, I feel that most classes would benefit from not allowing the use of laptops in class. In my own experience, it is easy to become distracted by a computer and lose track of what the professor is teaching. When looking around a lecture hall of students, it is not uncommon to find most other people on Facebook or various other sites. In most circumstances, laptops in lecture halls do more harm than good. They provide too much opportunity for distraction to students. Many students and professors would benefit from a stricter laptop policy in lecture halls. At the very least, schools should make it possible to turn off wifi access in lecture halls. The internet is the most distracting part of having laptops in lecture halls. If professors can control when internet access is on and when it is not, students could be more likely to utilize their computers for note taking. Internet access typically is not necessary for most classes. Overall, schools should enforce a stricter laptop policy in lecture halls, whether it be restricting laptop use entirely or simply access to the internet.

Georgia Tech and the Water Wars

Scott Zadig


In recent news, the three states of Florida, Georgia, and Alabama have been having “water wars” concerning the rights to use Lake Lanier as a source of water. The states of Florida and Alabama have been having issues with the amount of water they receive specifically from the Chattahoochee River. They do not receive enough water to meet their needs and they took the issue to Supreme Court. In the court ruling, a federal judge ruled that Georgia has been illegally tapping water from Lake Lanier and using water that should have gone to Florida and Alabama. Paul Magnuson, the federal judge that made this ruling, ordered that if Atlanta’s allocation of water does not return to what they were in 1970’s within the next three years, then Atlanta’s water will be significantly restricted.


If a solution is not found and the court ruling takes its affect, the city of Atlanta will suffer major consequences. There would be a deficit of approximately 302 million gallons a day and that the deficit would increase to 497 million gallons per day by the year 2035. Not only would this have a significant impact on the city of Atlanta, but also it would greatly affect the Georgia Institute of Technology. Georgia Tech is home to 9,700 students, which is approximately 54% of the student body. The water shortages would make Georgia Tech a difficult place to attend school, specifically to students who are from out of state and have to live on campus in order to attend classes. This fact alone would turn away potential undergraduate students if they do not have the option to live on campus and have a legitimate source of water. Reduction in the student body would most likely result from this court ruling and would in turn hurt the university as a whole. It would not only reduce the number of students, but the diversity of the student population would decrease as well because students from other states and countries are not going to attend a university that is inhabitable. Georgia Tech and its students make significant contributions to the city of Atlanta, the state of Georgia, and the world. A solution needs to be implemented before a ruling of such substantial impact takes place.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Caffeine Abuse: A Growing Addiction

Gregory Micek
Caffeine is a drug that plays a large role in the everyday life of an extremely large number of people. According to Time Magazine, the Journal of the American Diabetic Association notes that about “90% of adults ingest caffeine every day,” and National Geographic “has described caffeine as the world’s most popular psychoactive drug.” Caffeine is an extremely prevalent drug on which anyone can develop a dependency.

The role of caffeine in the college environment is such that it has become a necessity for many students. Students often use caffeine to avoid sleep, to stay awake longer, and to be more alert at night when cramming for exams or rushing late assignments. Time Magazine notes Michael Wood, a senior at Princeton University, who stated that “during reading period and finals week, caffeine becomes [his] lifeline.” Michael Wood also said that a couple of Red Bulls can make “you feel much more comfortable about leaving your semester-long research project for the last weekend before it’s due.” College students use caffeine to cram projects and assignments into all-nighters, rather than taking the necessary amount of time for a few weeks to prepare the project or assignment at a leisurely pace.

Caffeine abuse can lead to withdrawal and dependency. According to Time Magazine, “[a] 2006 study at Northwestern University found that 265 caffeine abuse cases were reported to a local U.S. regional poison control center from 2001 through 2004” and the average age was twenty-one, or an average senior in college. Caffeine withdrawal can cause individuals to feel “headache, fatigue and irritability,” and caffeine can also inhibit study by increasing anxiety rather than increasing alertness.

Monday, November 2, 2009

Gender Bias Awareness in Higher Education

By Rohan Gupta
Throughout the history of higher education in America, the capabilities of women were frequently undermined. In academe, the quality and priority of education for women was secondary to that of men and the acceptance of female professors was met with suspicion and reluctance. Though such times have changed, new stereotypes concerning the capabilities of women are emerging and becoming a major issue facing higher education. Because many members of academe believe that the motherhood of female professors hinders their competence, groups opposed to such criticism are now speaking out to stop such an attitude.
Contemporary critics assert that female professors compromise their judgement and abilities when they have children and believe such professors must not be given major academic duties. The center for WorkLife Law at the University of California's Hastings College developed an online bingo-type game to create awareness about gender bias and help recognize it in academe. The goal of the game is for female or sometimes even male professors with children to identify three types of gender biases in the work place and declare "bingo." The winner of the game receives a free t-shirt by mail. The center hopes that university administrators and other head bureaucrats will visit the website with the game and see the importance of the issue.
The game website also has material that should help female professors survive gender bias. The material includes scenarios, four patterns of bias, and an economic argument for administrators to stop such criticism. Hopefully these efforts by the center for WorkLife can eliminate such discrimination facing female professors and provide them with a more conducive atmosphere at work.